The employment of the names of Religious Names like that of God or of Jesus has been known by the masses as a tool that can be used and manipulated to enforce one's own will on others via the authority that is presumed to be vested in such names. It is this distinction which posits the wisdom of investigating the use of these names, and where true authority in anyone's words truly is derived from. I do not deny that Jesus nor God are actual individuals or personifications of the Logos or of the Primordial Self and DemiUrge that created the entirety of All of Time and Space - but I do challenge the MANY instances and cases where such names are used without due justification, and without the genuine spirit and force and gravitas with which they ought to be used by those who have been privilieged with authority by the powers that be to use such names in any institution, whether that is a Church, or a State, or any other fellowship.
With that being said, it is vital for anyone who is of any jurisdprudence, to continue to remember the vital importance or the gravitas that attends such names, and of the importance that anyone who would use such names ought to maintain. This is why the work of Friedrich Nietzsche is of such vital importance - he was a man out of time who knew that through the mastery of religious vernacular that one is then equipped to be able to navigate the intricacies of this world and of society at large which takes for granted that their institutions are sufficiently equipped with sufficient authority to enjoin upon others that which their office esteems itself to maintain in the promotion and advancement of all societal fellowships which fall underneath the purview of that authority.
It is with this in mind that it becomes vital for anyone of any sound mind to then consider the vast importance of religous texts and their origination, and in particular of the importance of revelation as it is. Controversy in the world of men and of the gods is of vital difference - the controversy amongst men often times entails the imprudent use of language, and the unjustified and unsubstantiated assertions of commonly used verbiage that is often times taught to them as if they have no authority in and of themselves, but rather that they have it as it is derived from other institutions. Those who have entered into the realm of the gods are those who no longer vest authority in other men or women, but who, in mindful awareness of their surroundings and of their place in the world, are cognizant of how this world functions and of the fact that institutions amongst men will always exist, but that such are merely substructures in the realm of ideas, and in the realm of ideas is where true freedom is to be found for those who wish to enjoin upon themselves the agency and capacity for higher order reasoning.
Without such awareness, one will always be subservient with regards to these institutions as if they are the God of Gods - and yet such structures are often times the means of order in this world. With such in mind, those who are not capable of understanding this will not be capable of such higher order reasoning, and therefore it is for such individuals that such structures exist as a general rule. It is with such in mind that the show Halo proves to be a useful allegorical device in depicting what it is like for any individual who has been disabused of notions that employ the names of God to unjustly and cruelly mangle one's psyche to be set free from such:
Post Comments(0)